The £230m Misfire: Amorim’s Rigid 'System' Sparks Early Crisis at Old Trafford

It took just 180 minutes of football for the honeymoon to dissolve into a familiar shade of crisis. Following a lifeless 1-0 defeat to Arsenal, Manchester United’s trip to Craven Cottage was supposed to be the corrective. Instead, it became an autopsy of Ruben Amorim’s tactical stubbornness. A 1-1 draw against Fulham—marked not by United’s brilliance but by a Rodrigo Muniz own goal—has left the Red Devils with a solitary point from their opening two fixtures, their worst start in the Premier League era for this specific fixture run.

The Mainoo Paradox: System vs. Talent

The most glaring omission on the teamsheet wasn't an injury, but a choice. Kobbie Mainoo, arguably the club’s most press-resistant asset, was left to watch from the sidelines as Amorim persisted with a Casemiro-Diallo pivot that lacked both control and dynamism. The decision has baffled supporters and pundits alike.

Sources close to the training ground suggest the friction stems from Amorim’s demand for "robotic positioning" in his 3-4-3—a system where the central midfielders must cover vast lateral spaces. Amorim has previously hinted that Mainoo "needs to understand the position better" and play at different speeds, but benching a generational talent for tactical dogma has backfired. As one viral fan post on X noted: "Amorim is determined to try everyone in midfield except the one guy who can actually hold the ball. If your system can't fit Mainoo, change the system."

The "Iwobi Blueprint": A Tactical Leak?

Perhaps the most damning indictment came not from the pundits, but from the opposition dressing room. Speaking post-match, Fulham midfielder Alex Iwobi casually dismantled United’s setup, revealing exactly how Marco Silva’s side planned to bypass the visitors.

"We knew we could get behind their two midfielders. We knew their centre-backs would want to 'jump' [aggressively press forward], and we exploited that space behind them."

Iwobi’s comments highlight a structural flaw in Amorim’s high-line philosophy. When the wide centre-backs (in this case, likely De Ligt or Martinez) push up to engage, and the double pivot is stretched, a massive void opens centrally. Fulham capitalized on this repeatedly, turning United’s aggressive press into their own playground. Wayne Rooney, speaking on the BBC, didn't mince words regarding this naivety: "There are no excuses left. You cannot leave the middle of the park that open in this league."

The £200m Blunt Force

Beyond the tactical blackboard, the economics of this failure are stark. The club sanctioned a staggering £200m (approx. €230m) spend on attacking reinforcements this summer to fit Amorim’s vertical style. The return? Zero goals from United players in two games. The solitary strike at Craven Cottage came courtesy of a fortunate deflection off Fulham's Muniz.

Amorim’s post-match assessment was alarming in its passivity. "We scored and then forgot how to play," he admitted. "We weren't smart." But for a fanbase tired of "trusting the process," the sight of a manager blaming game management while his expensively assembled attack fails to register a shot on target for long periods is a red flag waving vigorously.